Privacy
Skip to main content
Taboola above article placeholder

Reform's Robert Jenrick just exposed this - it's a major betrayal of hard-working Brits

MARTYN BROWN - ANALYSIS: It's not just economically illiterate; it is plain immoral.

17 Comments
By Martyn Brown, Political Editor

Reform Party press conference: Ending Benefits Britain, London

Robert Jenrick (Image: Getty)

The need to slash Britain’s bloated welfare bill has never been more dire. It is set to reach an eye-watering £407 billion by 2030 - a ticking time bomb that will bankrupt our nation.

Critics say this has been fuelled by a handout culture, sky-high immigration rates over the past two decades and a tepid economy that is being bled dry by lost productivity. For too long, the political class has ducked the tough decisions, preferring the comfort of the status quo to the harsh reality of fiscal responsibility.

Welfare

Government spending on welfare (Image: DWP)

But the status quo is not just unsustainable - it is a betrayal of the British worker.

When a system designed to support the vulnerable transforms into a lifestyle choice, the social contract is broken.

Reform UK has finally grasped the nettle, unveiling a comprehensive 50-page blueprint to carve £50 billion out of this monster budget.

Their plan to ban foreign nationals from claiming almost all forms of welfare is a necessary step to stop the British taxpayer from subsidising the world.

As Reform’s Robert Jenrick rightly warns, forcing British workers to pay for the benefits of those who have never contributed is not just economically illiterate; it is plain immoral.

The numbers speak for themselves. Between April 2022 and February 2026, we shelled out £55 billion on benefits for foreign nationals.

This is money that should be funding our public services, our defence, and our infrastructure, not propping up an open-door benefit system.

Welfare spending

Welfare spending (Image: DWP)

Then there is the explosion in disability and sickness claims.

With nearly 720,000 claimants expected for mild mental health or neurodiversity by the end of the Parliament, we have clearly lost our way.

We have created a culture of welfare over work, where thousands of young adults are written off before their lives have even begun.

Reassessing these claims, as both Reform and the Conservatives have proposed, isn't about being cruel, it is about restoring the principle that work should always pay, and that welfare must be a bridge to independence, not a permanent parking space.

Labour’s response to this crisis is the standard tired retort: "fantasy economics."

They would rather protect their ideological comfort zone and kowtow to their left-wing backbenchers than fix the leak in the boat.

But while Andy Burnham and his ministers wring their hands, Britain is drowning.

We cannot tax our way to growth, and we certainly cannot borrow our way to prosperity.

We need to stop the handouts, get people back to the alarm-clock rhythm of work, and restore a sense of fairness.

If we don’t act now to bring this spiralling bill under control, we will not just be a nation with a welfare state attached; we will be a nation that has simply run out of road.

The time for tinkering at the edges is over.

We need radical, decisive action to get Britain working again.

17 Comments

Conversation

|
Commenting is subject to our house rules.

Top Comments

    1. Comment by henrymccarty.

      Interesting how The Express frame this to sound like Jenrick has identified a salient point that the Conservative and Labour have failed to realise. The reality is, he's endorsing the same kind of social security system that has existed in the EU for decades. Moreover, a system that the Tories and Labour have both flirted with over the years, but encountered massive public opposition.

      In the majority of Europe, benefits are contributions based only. If you don't pay in through legitimate employment, you have very little to fall back on if you lose your job. Moreover, your entitlement is not indefinite, so the sooner you are back in work, the less of your entitlement you have used up, and saved for any future tough times.

      Put simply, everyones entitlement is different and based on their own contributions. If you've worked for many years, you will have a decent cushion. If you've only worked sporadically, you will have less entitlement for a shorter time, which then drives people to look for new work, rather than simply 'wait to see what comes along.' However, the UK public are so entrenched in a benefits system of 'free at the point of need' any attempts to change it have become an election losing policy.

    2. Comment by saoutchik.

      Number of prison places added by successive governments-

      Labour 1997-2010 +28,000

      Conservative2010-2024 -500

      Did you put that to former Tory minister Mr Jenrick and what was his reply?

      Secondly, since the headline refers to the 'betrayal of hard working Brits,' i'm sure - as any journalist of good faith would do - you will have reminded him that he helped a pornographer ( who also used to own a newspaper, I forget which one) dodge £40 million in tax which to my mind constitutes a far greater betrayal of the taxpayer than anyone currently in jail.

    3. Comment by Bigalmackay.

      The state pension is the obvious one to cut. We baby boomers had had it too good for too long. Free university education, cheap houses, triple locked pensions. It's time we gave something back to the sruggling youth of our country.

    ×